Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Camaro vs. Challenger Size Comparison

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Camaro vs. Challenger Size Comparison

    From the same guy that did previous comparison pictures:

    Camaro:
    110.5" Wheelbase
    186.2" Length

    Challenger:
    116.0" Wheelbase
    197.8" Length

    Joe K.
    '11 BMW 328i
    '10 Matrix S AWD
    Previously: '89 Plymouth Sundance Turbo, '98 Camaro V6, '96 Camaro Z28, '99 Camaro Z28, '04 Grand Prix GTP

  • #2
    Interesting indeed........DC likes to build "big cars", even back in the 60's - 70's muscle car era, their cars were historically large, compared to Chevy's Camaro, the Chevelle, and etc., with the exception of the Impala SS of course..LOL Ther Charger, Magnum, Road Runner were all boats in comparison to most cars, but fast just the same.

    The Goldens: Reno and Rocky

    2008 C6, M6, LS3, Corsa Extreme C/B, (it flys) & 2008 Yukon loaded (Titanic), 03 Ford Focus..everydaydriver.

    Wolfdog Rescue Resources, Inc.:http://www.wrr-inc.org
    Home Page: http://www.renokeo.com
    sold: 97 Firehawk, 97 Comp T/A, 2005 GTO, 2008 Solstice GXP turbo.

    Comment


    • #3
      I know what you mean. I grew up with Dukes of Hazard. When you see an older Charger, it's a HUGE car. I love the styling, but wonder about the driving experience. SRT seems to have done some wonderful things with the new Charger and 300C, but there's only so much you can do with more power. Weight is just as important, if not more so. The whole thing is a wait and see thing though because the final product, pricing, packaging, is still up in the air.
      Joe K.
      '11 BMW 328i
      '10 Matrix S AWD
      Previously: '89 Plymouth Sundance Turbo, '98 Camaro V6, '96 Camaro Z28, '99 Camaro Z28, '04 Grand Prix GTP

      Comment

      Working...
      X