Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
trans prob!!!!!!!!
Collapse
X
-
Its true though, You find a bunch of rubber in the wheel well and you think thats right. Just goes to show you Nissan didnt prep the car to handle some harsh driving. Its like buying a ZO6 and the tranny going out. PLease there are guys pushing 700+hp and stock trans handles it. What did Nissan expect with All-Wheel-Drive, Extreme launches are going to happen but i dont think NIssan should pay. Maybe 50/50Eddie
2000 M6 Trans Am
Tune+exhaust=344WHP
Comment
-
And we thought whoever designed the optispark was a schmuck.Red 95 Trans Am: M6, Moroso CAI, Magnaflow, Spohn sway bars, back to life as of 2/15/10!!!
SOLD- Kinda miss it
94 Del Sol VTEC: 27 city/ 33 highway, knee deep in slowness
SOLD- Good riddance!
2006 Ford Fusion: 2.3, 5 speed, could run 15lbs of boost with a 150 shot and it'd still be slow
Comment
-
what came down to is that they disengaged that torque control button. The warranty stated that the warranty is VOID if it is disengaged for anything other than getting unstuck from snow or mud. They flew several techs from Japan just to verify the button disengagement as it was cheaper than replacing the tranny... what's the selling point of the car then?Rhode Island Red *Lurker since 1997*
2002 Firehawk #0035/1503 !Cags | !Air | !PCV | Airborn-coated Kooks LT's | Powerbond UD Pulley | Custom Cam | Ported Oil pump | LS2 timing chain | Comp 918's | Hardened push rods | LSS | BMR STB | SLP Bolt-on SFC's | drill mod |TB Bypass | Ported TB | Custom Dyno tuning | 160* thermostat | LS7 Clutch
Ordered: May 1, 2001 Built: June 1, 2001 Delivered August 25, 2001
pics and info
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rhode Island Redwhat came down to is that they disengaged that torque control button. The warranty stated that the warranty is VOID if it is disengaged for anything other than getting unstuck from snow or mud. They flew several techs from Japan just to verify the button disengagement as it was cheaper than replacing the tranny... what's the selling point of the car then?
that just makes the ZR1 a better option...
Comment
-
Funny, my GTP when new came with a 'trac off' button. If I did hard launches with that off, I'd destroy the trans in short order. But GM would have stood behind that warranty...
Sorry, but Nissan should be standing behind that warranty and replacing this guy's trans for free. If the trans can't handle the power with this button off, then the button shouldn't be installed. DUH.
Comment
-
Does your GTP have AWD? With AWD and 500 HP something has to give- when you are smoking 4 tires at a time, thats a big load- Our F-bodies frag their rear ends only spinning two tires....2001 Z28 A4 - 160 deg t-stat, 3.42 gears, WS6 sway bars, rear springs and shocks, UMI SFC's, Torque Arm and STB, leather Firebird seats, Borla, SLP Y-pipe and lid, ZO6 cam and springs - 332 RWHP and 346 RWTQ, not bad for 'almost stock' - work in progress
"Black, the fastest color"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild WillyDoes your GTP have AWD? With AWD and 500 HP something has to give- when you are smoking 4 tires at a time, thats a big load- Our F-bodies frag their rear ends only spinning two tires....Red 95 Trans Am: M6, Moroso CAI, Magnaflow, Spohn sway bars, back to life as of 2/15/10!!!
SOLD- Kinda miss it
94 Del Sol VTEC: 27 city/ 33 highway, knee deep in slowness
SOLD- Good riddance!
2006 Ford Fusion: 2.3, 5 speed, could run 15lbs of boost with a 150 shot and it'd still be slow
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild WillyDoes your GTP have AWD? With AWD and 500 HP something has to give- when you are smoking 4 tires at a time, thats a big load- Our F-bodies frag their rear ends only spinning two tires....
I was simply pointing out that if you put in the equivalent of a 'trac off' button, the trans you're using should be able to hold up to it for at least a short period of time. From the sounds of it, Nissan's transmission won't hold up to it more than once or twice.
Comment
-
So, you are saying that you modified your drivetrain, and don't think the transmission can take the extra output- and, in fact, it probably would, for a while at least- GM reliability is very good- look at all these F-bodies that get modified and seriously beat on by 19-year-old racer wannabes-
The Nissan, costing what, about 3 times what your GTP cost is completely bone stock- and still can't take a full performance take-off without voiding the warranty and seriously shortening the life of the components- That's good engineering! /sarcasm off/
If GM did something like this, you would be reading about it on the front page of every trade magazine, and 60 minutes would be doing a faked report- Nissan does it, and everybody thinks it is okay-.....2001 Z28 A4 - 160 deg t-stat, 3.42 gears, WS6 sway bars, rear springs and shocks, UMI SFC's, Torque Arm and STB, leather Firebird seats, Borla, SLP Y-pipe and lid, ZO6 cam and springs - 332 RWHP and 346 RWTQ, not bad for 'almost stock' - work in progress
"Black, the fastest color"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild WillySo, you are saying that you modified your drivetrain, and don't think the transmission can take the extra output- and, in fact, it probably would, for a while at least- GM reliability is very good- look at all these F-bodies that get modified and seriously beat on by 19-year-old racer wannabes-
The Nissan, costing what, about 3 times what your GTP cost is completely bone stock- and still can't take a full performance take-off without voiding the warranty and seriously shortening the life of the components- That's good engineering! /sarcasm off/
If GM did something like this, you would be reading about it on the front page of every trade magazine, and 60 minutes would be doing a faked report- Nissan does it, and everybody thinks it is okay-.....2006 Saturn Ion Redline
2003 Mits. Eclipse Spyder
Comment
Comment