Also - your trap speed is not indicative of that kind of power - look at mine for example - a little over 108 with 20 less Rwhp than you? It doesn't matter anyway but the numbers on your car seem a little off. Nice job at the track though - it is the only time I want an auto - my 6 speed is a nightmare to launch for me!
-
Silver 02 WS-6, 6 speed, Corsa cat-back, SLP lid, K&N filter, BMR STB, !CAGs, Lou's short stick, MSD wires, MTI "Hammer" cam, ASP underdrive pulley, Hooker LTs, Hooker ORY, Comp 918s, TR pushrods, UMI Sfcs, UMI LCAs, NGK TR55s, Hotchkis springs
Dyno'd 4/24: 330.9 RWHP/ 344.8 RWTQ (Before cam, headers, and pulley)
Dyno'd 5/1: 383.5 RWHP / 380.5 RWTQ (393 actual RWHP) -
The thing you guys need to understand here and are forgetting is
, LSx motors do not follow trends. The nature of the design of the entire motor is much more race oriented than the previous Gen I and II small blocks.
Yes, "usually" stock h/c and even mild cam only or even very mild h/c LSx motors tend to show more RWTQ than HP. However, there are so many variables when it comes to chassis dyno power measurements that it is not even funny.......chassis dyno mechanical variations, dyno operator variances, weather variances, improper air flow to the front of the vehicle, dynoing in a different gear, dyno "tricks", improper correcting, improper dyno drum maintenace, different dyno "types", and so on, and so on, and so on.
Is his trap reflective of his power shown in his sig? Not by bandwagon norms, BUT I have seen it all at the track when it comes to LS1's.
Comment
-
Casey, that does make a lot of sense, since that shop opened up not too long before i had mine dynoed. Hmmm.. I'll have to get it done at another shop for a comparison sometime.2006 GTO Impulse Blue Metallic, Blue Leather Interior
Traded in: 1998 Z28
http://www.cardomain.com/id/hotwhip9Comment
Comment