Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Night @ the Dyno!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Night @ the Dyno!

    decided to get my new setup dynoed. if you can notice on the dyno sheet, it appears the pcm is pulling timing around 4k-4500 rpm which is holding some power back. i believe its the lt1 knock module. i just ordered an lt4. had alot of fun... never been on a dyno before, i wish i had one of these things in my garage!

    -chris

    run links:

    http://www.putfile.com/media.php?n=run189
    http://www.putfile.com/media.php?n=run268
    http://www.putfile.com/media.php?n=run376
    http://www.putfile.com/media.php?n=run431
    http://www.putfile.com/media.php?n=run5

    dyno sheet:
    http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=8/21814243672.jpg&s=x1

  • #2
    Don't take this the wrong way... but those numbers seem abnormally low...

    I'm sure the timing has something to do with it... but damn... for a DynoJet, that seems really really low for a blown car.
    Former Ride: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 - 345 rwhp, 360 rwtq... stock internally.

    Current Ride: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT Limited - spec.B #312 of 500

    Comment


    • #3
      well the motor is also 11 years old w/ 90k on it. it does need some tuning thats for sure lol. was thinking about swapping a newer built ls1 motor w/ the blower in there over the winter but well see how the $ situation goes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Jay 02 TA ws6
        Don't take this the wrong way... but those numbers seem abnormally low...

        I'm sure the timing has something to do with it... but damn... for a DynoJet, that seems really really low for a blown car.
        Jay he's only running 7 psi, that's not that much boost. he also has a cf df clutch which was probably slipping. Aside from the s/c, his car isn't modified all that much. I'd say 350/380 at the wheels is pretty impressive, and pretty normal.
        97 Chevy 'Raro Z28 M6- Ported & Polished LT1 heads,beehives,1.6/1.94 valves, 226/231 custom cam,K&N FIPK, 94-95 BBK shorty's,ORY,Magnaflow Catback,no cats,BMR LCA Relocation Brackets,Lower Control Arms,Adjustable Panhard Bar,Eibach Pro Kit,SPEC Stage 1,Walbro 255 Fuel Pump,30LB Injectors,Pro 5.0,Short stick,MSD 8.5's,NGK TR55's,LT4KM

        01 Honda CBR600 F4i-Two bro's,Corbins,SS brake lines

        Comment


        • #5
          Not to hijack the thread or whine like a little girl or anything, but this is what depresses me about my car. Jay's 02 WS6 with only bolt ons had the same RWHP as Paxton350's supercharged LT1. I guess it doesn't all necessarily come down to horsepower though, right? Joe's bolt ons wouldn't even bring the car to 300RWHP, would it? He still managed to run a 13 flat. I'd still like to be making some decent numbers, though.

          *EDIT* I just saw that he has Flowmasters like me. Could that be preventing him from making more power?
          Red 95 Trans Am: M6, Moroso CAI, Magnaflow, Spohn sway bars, back to life as of 2/15/10!!!
          SOLD- Kinda miss it
          94 Del Sol VTEC: 27 city/ 33 highway, knee deep in slowness
          SOLD- Good riddance!
          2006 Ford Fusion: 2.3, 5 speed, could run 15lbs of boost with a 150 shot and it'd still be slow

          Comment


          • #6
            349 RWHP is extremely low on an LT1 if you are truly getting 7 PSI at the manifold. You are getting boost blowby into the crankcase, or your intake temps are astronomically hot, and/or you are having timing/fuel issues. Something is very wrong. I suspect you are not getting all of the boost into the cylinder. Possible due to tired rings, and/or valve seals/guides. Do you have a intake manifold boost gauge? Have you ever measured the crankcase pressure? Do you have a crankcase evacuation line running from the head unit?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by fastTA
              349 RWHP is extremely low on an LT1 if you are truly getting 7 PSI at the manifold. You are getting boost blowby into the crankcase, or your intake temps are astronomically hot, and/or you are having timing/fuel issues. Something is very wrong. I suspect you are not getting all of the boost into the cylinder. Do you have a intake manifold boost gauge? Have you ever measured the crankcase pressure? Do you have a crankcase evacuation line running from the head unit?
              no i havnt measured crankcase pressure, only compression 2 seasons ago which was all within 10%. i do not have an intake manifold boost gauge, well i used to but am ordering a new one due to the low amt of boost , the universal turbo one i had before was not accurate at all... no i havnt measured crankcase pressure... i know i have a timing issue, however my air fuel ration is dead n if you look at the dyno sheet... and that is new to me a "crankcase evacuation line" i do not have one...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Nightrage
                Not to hijack the thread or whine like a little girl or anything, but this is what depresses me about my car. Jay's 02 WS6 with only bolt ons had the same RWHP as Paxton350's supercharged LT1. I guess it doesn't all necessarily come down to horsepower though, right? Joe's bolt ons wouldn't even bring the car to 300RWHP, would it? He still managed to run a 13 flat. I'd still like to be making some decent numbers, though.

                *EDIT* I just saw that he has Flowmasters like me. Could that be preventing him from making more power?
                you are very confused dude. Do a head/cam combo and see how depressed you are. They make tons of power, it's just got bad heads.

                I don't know what kind of car you are wanting to get that's gonna see huge gains from minor bolt-ons.
                97 Chevy 'Raro Z28 M6- Ported & Polished LT1 heads,beehives,1.6/1.94 valves, 226/231 custom cam,K&N FIPK, 94-95 BBK shorty's,ORY,Magnaflow Catback,no cats,BMR LCA Relocation Brackets,Lower Control Arms,Adjustable Panhard Bar,Eibach Pro Kit,SPEC Stage 1,Walbro 255 Fuel Pump,30LB Injectors,Pro 5.0,Short stick,MSD 8.5's,NGK TR55's,LT4KM

                01 Honda CBR600 F4i-Two bro's,Corbins,SS brake lines

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by paxton350
                  no i havnt measured crankcase pressure, only compression 2 seasons ago which was all within 10%. i do not have an intake manifold boost gauge, well i used to but am ordering a new one due to the low amt of boost , the universal turbo one i had before was not accurate at all... no i havnt measured crankcase pressure... i know i have a timing issue, however my air fuel ration is dead n if you look at the dyno sheet... and that is new to me a "crankcase evacuation line" i do not have one...
                  The crankcase evac line is basically a vacuum line that runs from the inlet side of the head unit to the valve cover. It helps to eliminate crankcase pressure...especially if you are experiencing boost blowby.

                  If you are still using the OEM type PCV valve, you need to make sure that the check valve is functioning properly. You should also look for signs of belt slippage (black powder), and make sure your head unit bracket is tight and not moving around. It doesn't take much movement at all of the bracket to create significant belt slip.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by fastTA
                    The crankcase evac line is basically a vacuum line that runs from the inlet side of the head unit to the valve cover. It helps to eliminate crankcase pressure...especially if you are experiencing boost blowby.

                    If you are still using the OEM type PCV valve, you need to make sure that the check valve is functioning properly. You should also look for signs of belt slippage (black powder), and make sure your head unit bracket is tight and not moving around. It doesn't take much movement at all of the bracket to create significant belt slip.
                    im sorry head unit your talking about?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by raroZ28
                      you are very confused dude. Do a head/cam combo and see how depressed you are. They make tons of power, it's just got bad heads.

                      I don't know what kind of car you are wanting to get that's gonna see huge gains from minor bolt-ons.
                      You misenterpreted it, probably my fault. I meant that i can't imagine slapping a supercharger on my car and only putting out as much power as an LS1 with bolt ons. By the bolt ons comments, i meant that having more horsepower doesn't necessarily mean that you're faster. Reassuring myself in a way. LS1's are said to dyno close to 300 horsepower bone stock. They're also said to run mid 13's (13.5- 13.6-ish from what i've heard). Joe's car has less than 300 horsepower yet ran a 13 flat. He has the faster car, even if he doesn't make as much power. I never said that i wanted huge gains from bolt ons. I'd would like to be making at least 300 horsepower to the wheels but that's not happening any time soon. Even if high horsepower doesn't mean everything, it's still nice to have (for bragging rights if nothing else). I figured that a supercharged LT1 would blow an LS1 out of the water as far as numbers go, however they were very similar. Thanks for pointing out my mistake though. A lot of the time something will sound right in my mind, yet make no sense to anyone else. If you have any other questions, please bring them to my attention.
                      Red 95 Trans Am: M6, Moroso CAI, Magnaflow, Spohn sway bars, back to life as of 2/15/10!!!
                      SOLD- Kinda miss it
                      94 Del Sol VTEC: 27 city/ 33 highway, knee deep in slowness
                      SOLD- Good riddance!
                      2006 Ford Fusion: 2.3, 5 speed, could run 15lbs of boost with a 150 shot and it'd still be slow

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Nightrage
                        Not to hijack the thread or whine like a little girl or anything, but this is what depresses me about my car. Jay's 02 WS6 with only bolt ons had the same RWHP as Paxton350's supercharged LT1. I guess it doesn't all necessarily come down to horsepower though, right? Joe's bolt ons wouldn't even bring the car to 300RWHP, would it? He still managed to run a 13 flat. I'd still like to be making some decent numbers, though.

                        *EDIT* I just saw that he has Flowmasters like me. Could that be preventing him from making more power?

                        I think dynos are good for having a car tuned and it is nice to have a high horsepower number but each dyno can be very different. Put Jay's and Paxton350's car on the same dyno and there may be a big hp difference. I'd wait and see what times and especially what trap speed he puts down at the track before jumping to any conclusions.
                        1994 Firebird Formula, M6, Fan switch, 160 thermostat, Pacesetter LT headers, Morosso CAI, TB bypass, True duals.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by paxton350
                          im sorry head unit your talking about?
                          The supercharger itself is referred to as the head unit. Not to be confused with the radio in your dash.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Nightrage
                            You misenterpreted it, probably my fault. I meant that i can't imagine slapping a supercharger on my car and only putting out as much power as an LS1 with bolt ons. By the bolt ons comments, i meant that having more horsepower doesn't necessarily mean that you're faster. Reassuring myself in a way. LS1's are said to dyno close to 300 horsepower bone stock. They're also said to run mid 13's (13.5- 13.6-ish from what i've heard). Joe's car has less than 300 horsepower yet ran a 13 flat. He has the faster car, even if he doesn't make as much power. I never said that i wanted huge gains from bolt ons. I'd would like to be making at least 300 horsepower to the wheels but that's not happening any time soon. Even if high horsepower doesn't mean everything, it's still nice to have (for bragging rights if nothing else). I figured that a supercharged LT1 would blow an LS1 out of the water as far as numbers go, however they were very similar. Thanks for pointing out my mistake though. A lot of the time something will sound right in my mind, yet make no sense to anyone else. If you have any other questions, please bring them to my attention.
                            How do you know Joe's car is making less than 300 RWHP? I've never seen dyno #s of his T/A I thought 108 mph trap speed would be in excess of 300 RWHP.
                            By the way, take a look at this thread: http://www.f-body.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10433 302 RWHP and his main mods at the time were CAI, catback, and custom tune.
                            94 Black T/A GT, Advanced Induction 355, 3200 stall, built 4L60E, Moser 9", Baer Brakes, Shooting for 11s...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by 94 formula
                              I think dynos are good for having a car tuned and it is nice to have a high horsepower number but each dyno can be very different. Put Jay's and Paxton350's car on the same dyno and there may be a big hp difference. I'd wait and see what times and especially what trap speed he puts down at the track before jumping to any conclusions.
                              DynoJet to DynoJet is pretty consistent... some variance, sure... but we're talking about 100-120 HP missing here.

                              An LS1 pushing 7 psi is going to dyno 450-500 rwhp... I would expect at least 400-450 out of the LT1.
                              Former Ride: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 - 345 rwhp, 360 rwtq... stock internally.

                              Current Ride: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT Limited - spec.B #312 of 500

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X