Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LT1 runs better cold...Is this normal

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LT1 runs better cold...Is this normal

    My LT1 seems to have a lot more power when its cold, like befor the temp guage hits normal operating temp. Why is this and is it normal.
    Does it indicate a problem.
    Thanx
    1995 Z28 Convertible, 350ci LT1 73K miles M6.
    Dyno results: 301.5 RWHP 326.7 RWTQ
    Performance Mods 4.10 gears, AS&M CAI, MADZ28 tune, Borla catback, RK Sport mid-length headers, LT4 valve springs, CC pro mag 1.6 RR's, LT4 KM, MSD OVC wires, TB bypass, 160 t-stat, SLP clutch plate w/Kevlar dual friction disk, 52MM TB, TB air foil, 1LE aluminum driveshaft, ASP UD pulley, LS1 brakes w/ Hawk HPS pads, LCA's and PHB.

  • #2
    Mine used to also (before i sold it) I would think it's simply beacuse the cooler air being ran through the throttle body is more dense at the cooler temp. Once the engine heats up and the throttle body heats up the air, making it less dense therefore less air.?! I maybe wrong.

    What part of Kentucky are you from?

    2005 GTO, Quicksilver, 6-Speed, DynaTech LT's and thats it. 366.6 hp/366.7 tq last time I checked.
    Sold-1995 Dark GreenTrans Am, Auto 63K. BBK Headers/off-road y-pipe/Hooker Exhaust/LPI CAI/Hypertech...need some money!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      There are a coupe things you can do.

      1) bypass the throttle body coolant lines
      This will keep the TB cooler and allow for cooler intake air into the motor.


      2) Relocate or bypass the IAT sensor with a cheap 4.7K ohm resistor from Radio Shack.
      The IAT sensor gets heat soaked and gives falsely high readings. You can relocate it to a cooler part of the intake track less open to heatsoak or you can bypass it with a resistor and fool the PCM into thinking it is cooler outside all the time. Adding the resisor requires running higher octane to avoid detonation from the increased timing advance.
      Tracy
      2002 C5 M6 Convertible
      1994 Z28 M6 Convertible
      Current Mods:
      SLP Ultra-Z functional ramair, SS Spoiler, STB, SFCs, Headers, Clutch, Bilstein Shocks, and TB Airfoil. 17x9 SS rims with Goodyear tires, 160F T-Stat, MSD Blaster Coil, Taylor wires, Hurst billet shifter, Borla catback with QTP e-cutout, Tuned PCM, 1LE Swaybars, 1LE driveshaft, ES bushings, White gauges, C5 front brakes, !CAGS, Bose/Soundstream audio, CST leather interior, synthetic fluids

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by TraceZ
        There are a coupe things you can do.

        1) bypass the throttle body coolant lines
        This will keep the TB cooler and allow for cooler intake air into the motor.


        2) Relocate or bypass the IAT sensor with a cheap 4.7K ohm resistor from Radio Shack.
        The IAT sensor gets heat soaked and gives falsely high readings. You can relocate it to a cooler part of the intake track less open to heatsoak or you can bypass it with a resistor and fool the PCM into thinking it is cooler outside all the time. Adding the resisor requires running higher octane to avoid detonation from the increased timing advance.
        #1 is good.
        #2 I don't agree with the resister trick.
        2002 Electron Blue Vette, 1SC, FE3/Z51, G92 3.15 gears, 308.9 RWHP 321.7 RWTQ (before any mods), SLP headers, Z06 exhaust, MSD Ignition Wires, AC Delco Iridium Spark Plugs, 160 t-stat, lots of ECM tuning

        1995 Z28, many mods, SOLD

        A proud member of the "F-Body Dirty Dozen"

        Comment


        • #5
          I already have the coolant bypass and I relocated the IAT sensor more downstream on my Cold Air Induction tube where it goes through the frame.
          I dont think I will do the resistor trick.
          1995 Z28 Convertible, 350ci LT1 73K miles M6.
          Dyno results: 301.5 RWHP 326.7 RWTQ
          Performance Mods 4.10 gears, AS&M CAI, MADZ28 tune, Borla catback, RK Sport mid-length headers, LT4 valve springs, CC pro mag 1.6 RR's, LT4 KM, MSD OVC wires, TB bypass, 160 t-stat, SLP clutch plate w/Kevlar dual friction disk, 52MM TB, TB air foil, 1LE aluminum driveshaft, ASP UD pulley, LS1 brakes w/ Hawk HPS pads, LCA's and PHB.

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't see in your signature, do you have a 160 thermostat?
            2002 Electron Blue Vette, 1SC, FE3/Z51, G92 3.15 gears, 308.9 RWHP 321.7 RWTQ (before any mods), SLP headers, Z06 exhaust, MSD Ignition Wires, AC Delco Iridium Spark Plugs, 160 t-stat, lots of ECM tuning

            1995 Z28, many mods, SOLD

            A proud member of the "F-Body Dirty Dozen"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jeff 95 Z28
              #2 I don't agree with.
              dont agree with which part of #2?

              relocating the IAT further from the engine is definitely a good idea. The way GM located it, it is subject to radiant heat from the motor. How dumb was it on GMs part to mount a temperature sensor for incoming air so close to the engine that it gets competely heat soaked?

              some people do disagree with the resistor mod. This mod will not do anything to improve WOT, but it does improve part throttle response and make the engine feel more powerfull under normal driving conditions. From what I've been told over the years it basically gives the engine more timing advance sooner.
              Tracy
              2002 C5 M6 Convertible
              1994 Z28 M6 Convertible
              Current Mods:
              SLP Ultra-Z functional ramair, SS Spoiler, STB, SFCs, Headers, Clutch, Bilstein Shocks, and TB Airfoil. 17x9 SS rims with Goodyear tires, 160F T-Stat, MSD Blaster Coil, Taylor wires, Hurst billet shifter, Borla catback with QTP e-cutout, Tuned PCM, 1LE Swaybars, 1LE driveshaft, ES bushings, White gauges, C5 front brakes, !CAGS, Bose/Soundstream audio, CST leather interior, synthetic fluids

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by TraceZ
                dont agree with which part of #2?

                relocating the IAT further from the engine is definitely a good idea. The way GM located it, it is subject to radiant heat from the motor. How dumb was it on GMs part to mount a temperature sensor for incoming air so close to the engine that it gets competely heat soaked?

                some people do disagree with the resistor mod. This mod will not do anything to improve WOT, but it does improve part throttle response and make the engine feel more powerfull under normal driving conditions. From what I've been told over the years it basically gives the engine more timing advance sooner.
                Sorry I was editing my post but you got it first.

                I don't agree with the resistor trick because it depends on the air temperature as to whether it helps or not. When it's cold outside it will make it worse. The O2s should compensate for it anyway.

                I think tricking the computer is poor way to adjust performance rather than doing it with the software.
                2002 Electron Blue Vette, 1SC, FE3/Z51, G92 3.15 gears, 308.9 RWHP 321.7 RWTQ (before any mods), SLP headers, Z06 exhaust, MSD Ignition Wires, AC Delco Iridium Spark Plugs, 160 t-stat, lots of ECM tuning

                1995 Z28, many mods, SOLD

                A proud member of the "F-Body Dirty Dozen"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Yup, got the 160 degree stat
                  1995 Z28 Convertible, 350ci LT1 73K miles M6.
                  Dyno results: 301.5 RWHP 326.7 RWTQ
                  Performance Mods 4.10 gears, AS&M CAI, MADZ28 tune, Borla catback, RK Sport mid-length headers, LT4 valve springs, CC pro mag 1.6 RR's, LT4 KM, MSD OVC wires, TB bypass, 160 t-stat, SLP clutch plate w/Kevlar dual friction disk, 52MM TB, TB air foil, 1LE aluminum driveshaft, ASP UD pulley, LS1 brakes w/ Hawk HPS pads, LCA's and PHB.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Just how much difference do you see in performance, after it heats up? Things like coolant temp and throttle body temp are going to make a difference, but just barely enough to "feel". If its anything more than that, you need to look at things that can be temperature sensitive.

                    O2 sensors fit into the equation, because when they are "cold" the PCM stays in open loop, and limits the adjustments to the A/F ratio. Under any sort of operating loads, its only looking at the long term fuel corrections in Cell 18, and that is a "synthetic" Cell, arrived at by a calculation using the "normal" Cells. After the O2 sensors warm up, the PCM goes into closed loop and starts looking at a whole set of long term fuel corrections. If the O2 sensors are producing "bad" data (e.g. they are faulty, or there are exhaust leaks or misfires) the long term corrections can get all screwed up and the car can lose major power under some operating conditions.

                    Also need to look at things that may break down when they get hot - IC Module (look for Shoebox's cooling mod), Opti optical sensor, coil, wire insulations, etc.

                    Also might have a problem with the coolant temp sensor. If it is giving false low temps, it will screw up the A/F ratio under most loads.

                    So.... its a matter of whether its just a change you can barely feel, or whether its a major loss of performance and/or smoothness when things heat up.
                    Fred

                    381ci all-forged stroker - 10.8:1 - CNC LT4 heads/intake - CC solid roller - MoTeC engine management - 8 LS1 coils - 58mm TB - 78# injectors - 300-shot dry nitrous - TH400 - Gear Vendor O/D - Strange 12-bolt - 4.11's - AS&M headers - duals - Corbeau seat - AutoMeter gauges - roll bar - Spohn suspension - QA1 shocks - a few other odds 'n ends. 800HP/800lb-ft at the flywheel, on a 300-shot. 11.5 @ 117MPH straight motor

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Which is better, a 160 or 180 degree thermostat?


                      SOLD 1995 Trans AM 6 Speed 68k Miles - Ram Air, Borla Cat-Back, AR TTII's, JL Audio W6v2 Stealthbox and 500/1 MonoBlock Amp, Alpine Component Speaker Systems

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Its a very small difference but just enough to notice, like turning the AC on then off kind of difference. It has new O2's and shoeboxes cooling mod to the ICM.
                        1995 Z28 Convertible, 350ci LT1 73K miles M6.
                        Dyno results: 301.5 RWHP 326.7 RWTQ
                        Performance Mods 4.10 gears, AS&M CAI, MADZ28 tune, Borla catback, RK Sport mid-length headers, LT4 valve springs, CC pro mag 1.6 RR's, LT4 KM, MSD OVC wires, TB bypass, 160 t-stat, SLP clutch plate w/Kevlar dual friction disk, 52MM TB, TB air foil, 1LE aluminum driveshaft, ASP UD pulley, LS1 brakes w/ Hawk HPS pads, LCA's and PHB.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I have the same problem with my car. It is a fairly noticable difference, if it is plugged into a scanner will this tell me if one of my sensors is worn out.
                          1997 Trans Am WS6
                          6 speed transmition
                          Flow Master cat back
                          other than that its stock

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Jeanius
                            Which is better, a 160 or 180 degree thermostat?

                            you live in california, do a 160. if its gets below 35* dont run your car, its not good

                            PCM for Less tuned PCM, LT4 heads & intake, SLP headers, 1.6 RR's, SLP strut tower brace, air foil, throttle body bypass, oil cooler, 160* thermo, 3200 stall converter, manual fan switch, line lock, tranny cooler, exhaust cut outs, zexel torsion carrier w/3:73 gears, Magnaflow exhaust, Q-Logic Custom Dual 12" Sub Box, custom drk metallic blue decals, etc
                            www.WS6Racing.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by brynnda
                              you live in california, do a 160. if its gets below 35* dont run your car, its not good
                              Why would it be a problem when temps are below 35*F? From a cold start, up until the coolant temp hits 160degF, there is no difference between a 160* and a 180*. And 160* is only the beginning of when the 'stat opens.... it still isn't fully open to about 180*. And at anything other than highway speeds, the coolant is going to be showing closer to 200* no matter which 'stat you have.

                              Remember, the LT1 coolant temp only looks low because the coolant is hitting the heads first, and then continuing through the engine where it continues to pick up heat. Watching my oil temp gauge, the oil always reaches a temperature sufficient to drive off water and other harmful contaminants.
                              Fred

                              381ci all-forged stroker - 10.8:1 - CNC LT4 heads/intake - CC solid roller - MoTeC engine management - 8 LS1 coils - 58mm TB - 78# injectors - 300-shot dry nitrous - TH400 - Gear Vendor O/D - Strange 12-bolt - 4.11's - AS&M headers - duals - Corbeau seat - AutoMeter gauges - roll bar - Spohn suspension - QA1 shocks - a few other odds 'n ends. 800HP/800lb-ft at the flywheel, on a 300-shot. 11.5 @ 117MPH straight motor

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X