OK, for all those who have been reading my posts about sugar in the tank, the insurance is trying to back out. This is unbelievable. I'm red with fury because of their childish explanations.
I filed the claim last Saturday and he told me to get an estimate and fax it over to him. Well, part way through the estimate, he found that it wouldn't run at all anymore, so he needed to replace the fuel pump. I said OK because the insurance required me to take it to San Jose (20 miles) so their rep can look at it.
Firstly, when I found out it doesn't run anymore, I couldn't contact the insurance - they wouldn't answer the phone. Since it wouldn't even run period, and it needed to be 20 miles south of the shop, I had to have the shop fix the fuel pump. It would have been ready by tonight. I left 2 messages on the insurance recorders, and they didn't bother to respond. I called again and finally got through to them and they said...since I didn't have a safeco rep look at the car before it was fixed, I have no proof it was tampered with??????????????????? It's word against word and they do NOT trust any mechanic's words - or my words - period. They said I or the mechanic could have switched out or tampered with the parts, could have lied, etc. WTF is the deal???
It is still currently being worked on right now, so I told the mechanic to stop. Then, when I talked to the safeco rep again, he told me that he wouldn't be able to get a rep out there until next Mon to Wed. OK, so it looks here that I would have to have the car wait outside for 5-6 days until "they" could look at it. Then I told him that I could stop the work and leave it outside until Monday...and his excuse was that it's not safe because of other potential vandalism. So what's the difference if it wasn't fixed??? It would have to wait outside for 5-6 days anyways!!!!!!! Isn't this circular reasoning??? They should have learned it in grammar school. He claims that the best thing I can do is to save all my receipts and hopefully they'll reimburse me - but they said that they mostly likely will not.
I have witnesses, but since they are not part of safeco, I could have 10+ witnesses and it would still mean "nothing" according to him.
They caused the problem by saying I must take it 20 miles south of the shop, then they blame me for trying to get it running to take it to their shop. This is unbelievable.
I filed the claim last Saturday and he told me to get an estimate and fax it over to him. Well, part way through the estimate, he found that it wouldn't run at all anymore, so he needed to replace the fuel pump. I said OK because the insurance required me to take it to San Jose (20 miles) so their rep can look at it.
Firstly, when I found out it doesn't run anymore, I couldn't contact the insurance - they wouldn't answer the phone. Since it wouldn't even run period, and it needed to be 20 miles south of the shop, I had to have the shop fix the fuel pump. It would have been ready by tonight. I left 2 messages on the insurance recorders, and they didn't bother to respond. I called again and finally got through to them and they said...since I didn't have a safeco rep look at the car before it was fixed, I have no proof it was tampered with??????????????????? It's word against word and they do NOT trust any mechanic's words - or my words - period. They said I or the mechanic could have switched out or tampered with the parts, could have lied, etc. WTF is the deal???
It is still currently being worked on right now, so I told the mechanic to stop. Then, when I talked to the safeco rep again, he told me that he wouldn't be able to get a rep out there until next Mon to Wed. OK, so it looks here that I would have to have the car wait outside for 5-6 days until "they" could look at it. Then I told him that I could stop the work and leave it outside until Monday...and his excuse was that it's not safe because of other potential vandalism. So what's the difference if it wasn't fixed??? It would have to wait outside for 5-6 days anyways!!!!!!! Isn't this circular reasoning??? They should have learned it in grammar school. He claims that the best thing I can do is to save all my receipts and hopefully they'll reimburse me - but they said that they mostly likely will not.
I have witnesses, but since they are not part of safeco, I could have 10+ witnesses and it would still mean "nothing" according to him.
They caused the problem by saying I must take it 20 miles south of the shop, then they blame me for trying to get it running to take it to their shop. This is unbelievable.

for an excuse to deny me.
but I am surprised that they are the #2 worst company 
Comment