Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A decade of HP behind

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A decade of HP behind

    Well, we have this expressway here in Augusta, actually it's Augusta's Autobaughn (spell that right?) called Riverwatch Parkway. Has some great banks and not sharp turns so that means little, or no, breaking at high speeds. Well, I was at high speeds today. Had some buddies for me down town and I ended up behind like a 2001 Mustang Cobra Convertible that I decided to have a little fun with. We started off just flying up to 100 then when my limiter reached like 120 he FLEW past my a$$ like I was sitting still. Remember I have a 92' stock TBI so I was pretty much smoked to start with. Fun though.

    1992 RS 25TH Anniversary (with Heritage package) A4 305 TBI (L03), Mobile 1 Synthetic, Flowmaster 80 Series Cat-Back, 17"x 8" Cragar style rims(painted grey)/Hankook Ventus 245/45Z17....350 Coming One Day......

  • #2
    for whatever reason my TBI doesnt have a limitor, when i was on a closed road with 5 miles of str8away i was doing 145-150 no problem
    2009 Honda Civic EX- the daily beater

    old toys - 1983 trans am, 1988 trans am, 1986 IROC-Z, 2002 Ram Off-Road, 1984 K10, 1988 Mustang GT, 2006 Silverado 2500HD

    Comment


    • #3
      Those Cobras are no joke. Even the convertibles are quick considering the extra weight they carry. Still, they don't look near as good as your car does.
      SOLD: 2002 Trans Am WS.6 - Black on Black - 6 Speed
      SLP Loudmouth Exhaust
      17K Miles

      2005 Acura TL - Silver on Black
      Navigation - Surround Audio - Bluetooth

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 88bird5spd
        for whatever reason my TBI doesnt have a limitor, when i was on a closed road with 5 miles of str8away i was doing 145-150 no problem
        i think from 92 and up the used speed density instead of the mass airflow sensor...that really doesnt have anything to do with a limiter but i figured they might have changed the setup when they switched to speed density.
        1996 Trans Am WS6

        A4, 3" VForce Catback, Corvette C6 rims, Slotted and Drilled Rotors, 160*stat, BMR SFC, HPP3, B&M Shift Kit.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by redws6
          i think from 92 and up the used speed density instead of the mass airflow sensor...that really doesnt have anything to do with a limiter but i figured they might have changed the setup when they switched to speed density.
          Good point. Could be a new set-up as my Friend's old '89 Iroc got up to 135 at our local track (Limerock).
          SOLD: 2002 Trans Am WS.6 - Black on Black - 6 Speed
          SLP Loudmouth Exhaust
          17K Miles

          2005 Acura TL - Silver on Black
          Navigation - Surround Audio - Bluetooth

          Comment


          • #6
            anything over 100mph in most states is straight to jail and impoundment of your car.........

            take it to the track.............






            The Goldens: Reno and Rocky

            2008 C6, M6, LS3, Corsa Extreme C/B, (it flys) & 2008 Yukon loaded (Titanic), 03 Ford Focus..everydaydriver.

            Wolfdog Rescue Resources, Inc.:http://www.wrr-inc.org
            Home Page: http://www.renokeo.com
            sold: 97 Firehawk, 97 Comp T/A, 2005 GTO, 2008 Solstice GXP turbo.

            Comment


            • #7
              145-150!!! WHat! Actually, I don't know if I'd want to push my engine THAT hard, I know that I dont need too(illegally). That Cobra was BAD!!! You never really can tell with those things, Mustangs I mean....you always run across guys with the wheels, body panels, and spoilers but all they have is a weak standard V6. But this was no V6. This guy had probably done tuning past the factory specs to his Cobra. Do those things come supercharged or something cuz all thy have in them is a little 4.6 EFI right, or is it a 5.0 or something? My guess is that is was a 01'. Thanks for saying that mine looks better, I agree. Our F-bodies have ALWAYS looked better than the Mustangs. Especially 3rd gen on up, F-bodies just kept getting better. The Mustang unfortunatley did the opposite it got uglier and cheaper. I'll admit the 05' and up have a good retro look but I know lots of owners and they say they regret the buy because they are built so CHEAP! Really, GM has always topped Ford on quality. But depite the fact that the Cobra was less attractive than mine and cheaper, the car smoked my a$$ and that means I need to start turning wrenches especially since its getting warm. I love working on the car when its warm, I just cant get into anything when its cold and wet outside.

              1992 RS 25TH Anniversary (with Heritage package) A4 305 TBI (L03), Mobile 1 Synthetic, Flowmaster 80 Series Cat-Back, 17"x 8" Cragar style rims(painted grey)/Hankook Ventus 245/45Z17....350 Coming One Day......

              Comment


              • #8
                Ok, I got some info on them. The picture I'm gonna attach is EXACTLY what the car looked like except he had some black bullet mags on his. So basically I was right when I posted earlier, they do have a that tiny 4.6 in them. They aren't supercharged, it's just a naturally asperated 320HP!!! So I managed to keep up with a 2001 SVT Mustang Cobra with a 320hp small-block, I think thats pretty damn good for a 92 stock TBI305. And I looked better doing it!!!
                Attached Files

                1992 RS 25TH Anniversary (with Heritage package) A4 305 TBI (L03), Mobile 1 Synthetic, Flowmaster 80 Series Cat-Back, 17"x 8" Cragar style rims(painted grey)/Hankook Ventus 245/45Z17....350 Coming One Day......

                Comment


                • #9
                  The '02 and up Cobras were supercharged. They were rated at 390 HP with the blower, but I tend to believe those numbers are suspect. I test drove one in '04. What turned me off the most was the quality of the interior (or lack thereof). It just didn't feel like 390 hp. Not even close. To be honest, my car feels more powerful, even if it isn't.
                  SOLD: 2002 Trans Am WS.6 - Black on Black - 6 Speed
                  SLP Loudmouth Exhaust
                  17K Miles

                  2005 Acura TL - Silver on Black
                  Navigation - Surround Audio - Bluetooth

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 02 WS6
                    The '02 and up Cobras were supercharged. They were rated at 390 HP with the blower, but I tend to believe those numbers are suspect. I test drove one in '04. What turned me off the most was the quality of the interior (or lack thereof). It just didn't feel like 390 hp. Not even close. To be honest, my car feels more powerful, even if it isn't.
                    '03+

                    I agree with your sentiments... it doesn't feel nearly as fast as it is. The biggest reason for it is the shape of the torque curve. The LS1 torque curve continues to build up to its peak around 4500... so you feel like you're accelerating harder all the way up to that point. The Cobra, on the other hand, peaks somewhere around 2000 and ever so slowly falls off from there... so as soon as you reach that point, the car isn't accelerating as quickly as it was earlier in the gear. With each upshift, the fastest the car will gain speed is right after you shift, and will drop off from there. It's still a relatively flat curve, but this is why it doesn't feel as fast. It pushes you in your seat really early on, and then lets up. Where as the f-body will continue to push you into your seat harder and harder, until you're past about 4500.

                    Most dyno tests showed the 390 number to be a gross underestimate. 425 is a little more like it. (360-370 rwhp on many stock dynos)
                    Former Ride: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 - 345 rwhp, 360 rwtq... stock internally.

                    Current Ride: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT Limited - spec.B #312 of 500

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by usamuscle892
                      Ok, I got some info on them. The picture I'm gonna attach is EXACTLY what the car looked like except he had some black bullet mags on his. So basically I was right when I posted earlier, they do have a that tiny 4.6 in them. They aren't supercharged, it's just a naturally asperated 320HP!!! So I managed to keep up with a 2001 SVT Mustang Cobra with a 320hp small-block, I think thats pretty damn good for a 92 stock TBI305. And I looked better doing it!!!
                      The 4.6L is FAR from tiny. It's a huge motor by physical size.

                      That car is probably a high-to-mid 13 second car (if driven competently)... I can't see you keeping up with him with a stock car.
                      Former Ride: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 - 345 rwhp, 360 rwtq... stock internally.

                      Current Ride: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT Limited - spec.B #312 of 500

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by usamuscle892
                        But depite the fact that the Cobra was less attractive than mine and cheaper, the car smoked my a$$ and that means I need to start turning wrenches especially since its getting warm. I love working on the car when its warm, I just cant get into anything when its cold and wet outside.
                        Wait... so did you keep up? Or did he smoke you?

                        This outcome seems much more like what should happen in the race if the Mustang is driven well. He wouldn't really need to be modded or tuned at all to do it, either.
                        Former Ride: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 - 345 rwhp, 360 rwtq... stock internally.

                        Current Ride: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT Limited - spec.B #312 of 500

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jay 02 TA ws6
                          '03+

                          I agree with your sentiments... it doesn't feel nearly as fast as it is. The biggest reason for it is the shape of the torque curve. The LS1 torque curve continues to build up to its peak around 4500... so you feel like you're accelerating harder all the way up to that point. The Cobra, on the other hand, peaks somewhere around 2000 and ever so slowly falls off from there... so as soon as you reach that point, the car isn't accelerating as quickly as it was earlier in the gear. With each upshift, the fastest the car will gain speed is right after you shift, and will drop off from there. It's still a relatively flat curve, but this is why it doesn't feel as fast. It pushes you in your seat really early on, and then lets up. Where as the f-body will continue to push you into your seat harder and harder, until you're past about 4500.

                          Most dyno tests showed the 390 number to be a gross underestimate. 425 is a little more like it. (360-370 rwhp on many stock dynos)
                          My bad. You're correct. It was the 2003 and 2004 Cobras that came blown.

                          Those dyno test numbers are interesting. I guess it's completely possible to be an underestimation. As I said, it just didn't feel all that fast. Your explanation as to why is spot-on. I never felt "wowed" while driving it. Again, it was only a test drive, but I put it through it's paces as far as acceleration was concerned. The gearbox felt extremely clunky also. Not sure if it's an issue with the clutch or the actual tranny, but I left the dealership unimpressed.

                          Needless to say, I was happy I bought an F-body over the drab and boring Mustang.
                          SOLD: 2002 Trans Am WS.6 - Black on Black - 6 Speed
                          SLP Loudmouth Exhaust
                          17K Miles

                          2005 Acura TL - Silver on Black
                          Navigation - Surround Audio - Bluetooth

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by 02 WS6
                            My bad. You're correct. It was the 2003 and 2004 Cobras that came blown.

                            Those dyno test numbers are interesting. I guess it's completely possible to be an underestimation. As I said, it just didn't feel all that fast. Your explanation as to why is spot-on. I never felt "wowed" while driving it. Again, it was only a test drive, but I put it through it's paces as far as acceleration was concerned. The gearbox felt extremely clunky also. Not sure if it's an issue with the clutch or the actual tranny, but I left the dealership unimpressed.

                            Needless to say, I was happy I bought an F-body over the drab and boring Mustang.
                            I also found its handling to be quite poor. The iron block made the car extremely nose-heavy and it would push badly in the turns. It was smoother than the f-body through corneres over rough surfaces (thanks to the IRS), but on smooth corners, my WS6 seemed to grip and turn-in much more aggressively. It's also about 300 lbs heavier than an LS1 f-body.

                            I walked away from my test drive with the same conclusions - happy I owned a WS6 and not a Mustang.

                            The shifter position in the Mustang is absolutely embarassing. It's terrible.
                            Former Ride: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 - 345 rwhp, 360 rwtq... stock internally.

                            Current Ride: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT Limited - spec.B #312 of 500

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Jay 02 TA ws6
                              I also found its handling to be quite poor. The iron block made the car extremely nose-heavy and it would push badly in the turns. It was smoother than the f-body through corneres over rough surfaces (thanks to the IRS), but on smooth corners, my WS6 seemed to grip and turn-in much more aggressively. It's also about 300 lbs heavier than an LS1 f-body.

                              I walked away from my test drive with the same conclusions - happy I owned a WS6 and not a Mustang.

                              The shifter position in the Mustang is absolutely embarassing. It's terrible.
                              Glad to see someone took it hard through corners on the test drive. Where I took my test drive, there weren't any good curves. I always wondered how it felt handling-wise. It definitely felt nose heavy. I did one hard stop with the salesman's permission. I was staring at pavement. It just dipped immediately.

                              Agree 100% on the shifter location. I couldn't see being comfortable in traffic with that. On the comfort note, I also found the seats to be unsupportive, like they wouldn't hold you through hard cornering. Did you find that to be the case?
                              SOLD: 2002 Trans Am WS.6 - Black on Black - 6 Speed
                              SLP Loudmouth Exhaust
                              17K Miles

                              2005 Acura TL - Silver on Black
                              Navigation - Surround Audio - Bluetooth

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X