Here's one for you guys. I was reading an old Hot Rod magazine from 96 where they compared the 96 WS6, 96 SS, and the Mustang Cobra (I think cobra??). Anyways, the SS ran a 13.55 or so, the Mustang ran a 14.1 and this is what gets me - the WS6 ran a 14.15 - the slowest of all of them. The SS also had 3 mph on the WS6 through the traps. Either they got a lemon for testing or the test driver was horribly inconsistant. I just found this strange. How could the WS6 be a half second slower AND get beat out by a mustang? Anybody read this article? I just found it interesting. I guess you cant trust magazine test drives?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hot Rod article- anyone read this?
Collapse
X
-
Hot Rod article- anyone read this?
96 WS6 Formula: Ram Air, 383 Stroker, Ported LT4 Heads and Manifold, 1.6 Crane Rollers, 58MM T.B., AS&M Headers, Borla Exhaust, Meziere Elec. H2O Pump, Canton Deep Sump Oil Pan, 100 HP OF TNT N2O!! , T56 Conversion w/ Pro 5.0 shifter, SPEC Stage 3 Clutch, Hotchkiss Subframe Conn., Lakewood Adj. Panhard Bar, Spohn Adj. LCA's, BMR Adj. T.A., Custom 12 bolt w/ 3:73's, Moser Axles, Eaton Posi, Moser Girdle
11.6 @ 123mph (1.6 60' - getting there )
Tags: None
-
This sounds like a pretty bad test. Actually, all three cars are pretty darn equal in the 1/4. I don't put a lot of stock into magazine test drivers, and the actual performance of the cars.'77 K5 rock-crawler project
'79 T/A: WS6, 400 4sp, 40K miles; Completely stock and original
'87 Lifted 3/4 ton Suburban (Big Blue) plow truck
'94 Roadmaster Wagon (The Roadmonster) 200,000 miles and still going
'97 T/A: (SLP 1LE Suspension, SB, & sfc(s), Loudmouth); 4.10s; B&M Ripper; R/A Hood; ZR1s
My daily drivers: '06 Jeep Liberty CRD (wife); '01 Yukon Denali XL (me); '03 Stratus Coupe (me)
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson
Comment
Comment