( I thought this was a discussion about our political choices, but am willing to go down a tangent) I have no problem with whatever consenting adults do in private. I object when they want to parade and flaunt their proclivities for all to see. Smacks a little too much too me, at least, of advertising. One thing I particularly abhor is when people of this persuassion try to seduce or recruit those who may be vulnerable. And, despite 'their' denials, it does occur. I am speaking from experience, not from any movies or scientific studies. I personally have been harassed and hounded despite my vigorous objections. Another thing I object to is the changing of accepted meanings of words- for example, 'gay' - remember when it used to mean care-free and happy? Now it has become laden with sexual innuendo- why call a civil contract between like-sex people a marriage? That word already has a defined meaning- If they want to have a contract,' 'til death do them part' fine, but don't rewrite the english langauge, please.
In either case, I don't think the government belongs in people's bedrooms, as long as no people are being harmed. Like abortion, that should be a private decision, that shouldn't have a whole bunch of others involved in making such difficult decisions. As the republicans CLAIM, but seldom exhibit, I am all for smaller, less-intrusive government. Cheaper, too- Unfortunately, I don't see that option in either candidate on the ballot this year-
In either case, I don't think the government belongs in people's bedrooms, as long as no people are being harmed. Like abortion, that should be a private decision, that shouldn't have a whole bunch of others involved in making such difficult decisions. As the republicans CLAIM, but seldom exhibit, I am all for smaller, less-intrusive government. Cheaper, too- Unfortunately, I don't see that option in either candidate on the ballot this year-
Comment