Originally posted by Craig 94 TA GT
I provide the requested info that shows a Camaro can be 40K (the car is over 40 if an Auto were on it), and you still try to dispute it like its not true.
Looks like I might have a Merry Christmas if nav is on the way. And I really do appriciate that info.
I never even said the car sucked. Companies that offer choices to consumers will thrive. I was validly criticizing GM for NOT offering a very popular option on a premier vehicle introduction.
I on the other hand am still
for the link to a $30K SS.Like I said before. GM is perfect and I was wrong. Thanks for setting me straight, best Camaro board on the internet.
In December, they will have the choice, but you're saying they suck for not having it in all Camaros?






The console gauges were a good idea. However, they are an option. I sat in one without them which left the inside of the car horribly bland. I guess it is great for those who wanted something stripped down for racing. Since the Firebird is done, GM should have stepped up the interior more on the Camaro. I hate to say it, but I like the Mustang and Challenger a lot better. As far as engines and power, there is no comparison. The direct injected V6 RS is GREAT car! If I was to buy one, that would be it. If this car came out say in around 2005, I probably would have bought one.
They found themselves with a lot of repeat customers shopping elsewhere….like me. They have a lot of damage control to do at this point. It will take a lot for them to earn my business again.

Comment